Know what sits behind the suggestion.
The three conversational tools use Claude and structured backend prompts. They generate estimates and explanations, not verified predictions.
AI risk
The prompt asks about tasks, repetition, creativity, human involvement, computer use, skills and industry. It includes example roles and score bands: Low 0–30, Medium 31–60, High 61–80 and Very High 81–100. These are prompt instructions, not statistically validated thresholds or probabilities of job loss.
Salary comparison
The prompt collects responsibilities, experience, city, work arrangement, industry, company type and salary. It contains reference salary ranges and scoring guidance, but no independently sourced live survey is queried by this chat route. Estimates, medians and percentiles must be verified before use.
Career guidance
The prompt considers education, interests, skills, location, financial goals, preferred work and constraints. It asks for three career options and affordable first steps. Match scores are model judgements, not psychometric results or probabilities of success.
Monthly check-ins
The check-in feature uses a separate AI prompt with heuristic score-adjustment instructions. Changes in the score are not proof of a measured reduction in redundancy risk. Use the explanations to reflect on learning and workplace changes.
Risk Index
Role-and-city index pages provide general estimates. They are not the same as a task-specific conversation and should not be interpreted as your personal risk. The conversational tool methodology above does not validate the index as a statistical forecast.
How to use the output
AI can be inconsistent, incomplete or out of date. Compare the reasoning with current job descriptions and independent evidence. Verify course eligibility, licensing requirements, fees and salary information directly. Never resign, borrow money or commit to expensive training solely because of an AI response.